Gender Gap in Scar Compensation | Console & Hollawell
(800) 455-2746Call now for help

$30,000,000 Won for
5000 Clients Over 20 Years

Gender Gap in Scar Compensation

The gender gap, or difference in treatment based on gender, can be seen in many aspects of life. One place you will almost certainly find this differential dealing is with regards to a personal injury case involving scarring. Each case will be as different as the person involved, yet by analyzing scarring cases it becomes clear that women generally receive more compensation than men for permanent scarring. While gender gaps are not fair, they are a reality. If you have sustained severe or permanent scarring as the result of an accident speak with an experienced personal injury lawyer in New Jersey today.

What is the reasoning behind this gap? For one, a woman is more likely to be affected by permanent scarring than men. Men have more body hair that can hide imperfections than women. For example we recently represented a client in which she had significant scarring on her knee. Had she been a man she may not have minded, but she was concerned about how her leg would look in shorts or when she was wearing a bathing suit. We were able to get her $60,000 for her injuries, but had she been a man she would have most likely received less.

Laws regarding compensation for scarring will differ in each state, but in New Jersey the opinion decided in Gilhooley v. County of Union, 164 N.J. 533, 544, 753 A.2d 1137 (2000) stated that:

A scar must impair or injure the beauty, symmetry, or appearance of a person, rendering the bearer unsightly, misshapen or imperfect, deforming her in some manner…[a] number of factors should be considered, including appearance, coloration, existence and size of the scar, as well as, shape, characteristics of surrounding skin, remnants of the healing process, and any other cosmetically important matters.

Richard Console, managing partner at Console & Hollawell, P.C., explained that there are several instances where compensation would differ for scarring. He said first any scarring that is immediately visible (such as scars on the face) will receive more money than one that can be easily concealed. He also explained that in almost all cases a client would receive more money if they were a woman or a child. Age also plays a factor in these cases as a young person would have to live with the disfigurement longer and therefore suffer more than an older person.

In these cases, the system seems to revolve around common gender stereotypes such as women are vainer and that men would enjoy the ruggedness of a scar. While it may be absurd to compensate more for a woman’s scar than a man’s that is the trend these types of cases seem to follow.

For more information about permanent scars and compensation speak with an injury attorney in NJ.

http://www.consoleandhollawell.com/new-jersey/personal-injury-lawyers/

http://www.consoleandhollawell.com/new-jersey/accident-injury-lawyers/

Share This WebsiteE-mail a link to this website

Tell a friend:


To get help with your personal
injury accident:

Please call us at
(856) 778-5500
for a free consultation

Trusted Professionals.
Proven Results.

Get Help Now

Frequently Asked Questions

You’ve Got Questions?
We’ve Got Answers.
Click the button below
to get started.

Client Reviews

“They followed through

They always had somebody working on
my case, so if I ever had any questions
they were right there.”

Fletcher W.
Car Accident & Bad Faith Insurance

“The best lawyers.

They know exactly how to get you
back on your feet. Now I can go on
with my life and be happy.”

Michael K.
Premises Liability Case

“They’re the best.

They made it easy for me to manage
my work and home life. They took
care of everything.”

Tameeka N.
Car Accident Case

“They organized everything.

They gave me peace of mind and
confidence that ultimately there
would be a fair outcome.”

Joshua T.
Construction Accident

“They earned my respect.

I never had a doubt
in their ability, sensitivity
or professionalism.”

Patricia M.
Medical Malpractice Case